( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguation of "Setton, David J."

Author of the publication

copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
Schrodinger's Galaxy Candidate: Puzzlingly Luminous at $z\approx17$, or Dusty/Quenched at $z\approx5$?

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and . (2022)cite arxiv:2208.02794Comment: Submitted to ApJL. Fig. 1 shows the "superposed" state, Fig. 2 presents the potential z~5 protocluster, Fig. 3 shows some atypical z~5 SEDs, Fig. 4 studies the morphology, Fig. 5 summarizes the extraordinary situation at z~17, and Fig. 6 argues for why such interlopers may not be a major issue for z>10 searches. Comments warmly welcomed.

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

Román Setton

David J Lutz

David J Downs

David J Roy

-J David Lin

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at $z\approx11-13$ Revealed by JWST, , , , , , , , , and 14 other author(s). (2022)cite arxiv:2207.09434Comment: Submitted to ApJL. Figs. 1 and 2 summarize the candidates, Fig. 3 places the brightness of these systems in context, Fig. 4 shows the morphology, Fig. 5 explores implications for the UVLF. Comments warmly welcomed.First spectroscopic observations of the galaxies that reionized the Universe, , , , , , , , , and 23 other author(s). (2023)cite arxiv:2308.08540Comment: 29 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables.Schrodinger's Galaxy Candidate: Puzzlingly Luminous at $z\approx17$, or Dusty/Quenched at $z\approx5$?, , , , , , , , , and 15 other author(s). (2022)cite arxiv:2208.02794Comment: Submitted to ApJL. Fig. 1 shows the "superposed" state, Fig. 2 presents the potential z~5 protocluster, Fig. 3 shows some atypical z~5 SEDs, Fig. 4 studies the morphology, Fig. 5 summarizes the extraordinary situation at z~17, and Fig. 6 argues for why such interlopers may not be a major issue for z>10 searches. Comments warmly welcomed.