Author of the publication

How portable are controlled language rules? A comparison of two empirical MT studies.

, and . MTSummit, (2007)

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Evaluating the Impact of Light Post-Editing on Usability., and . LREC, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), (2016)A virtuous circle: laundering translation memory data using statistical machine translation, , , and . Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 22 (3): 291--303 (October 2014)Correlations of perceived post-editing effort with measurements of actual effort., , , , and . Mach. Transl., 29 (3-4): 267-284 (2015)Towards predicting post-editing productivity.. Mach. Transl., 25 (3): 197-215 (2011)Post-Editing Evaluations: Trade-offs between Novice and Professional Participants., and . EAMT, European Association for Machine Translation, (2015)A Novel Statistical Pre-Processing Model for Rule-Based Machine Translation System., , , and . EAMT, European Association for Machine Translation, (2010)How portable are controlled language rules? A comparison of two empirical MT studies., and . MTSummit, (2007)What is the impact of raw MT on Japanese users of Word: preliminary results of a usability study using eye-tracking., , and . MTSummit (1), page 67-77. European Association for Machine Translation, (2019)The INTERACT Project and Crisis MT., , , , , , , and . MTSummit (2), page 38-48. (2017)Community-based post-editing of machine-translated content: monolingual vs. bilingual., , and . WPTP@MTSummit, (2013)