( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguierung von "Daniel, Hans-Dieter"

Autor der Publikation

KopierenLöschenDiese Publikation zur Ablage hinzufügen
Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factor.

, und . J. Informetrics, 6 (2): 169-176 (2012)

Bitte wählen Sie eine Person um die Publikation zuzuordnen

Um zwischen Personen mit demselben Namen zu unterscheiden, wird der akademische Grad und der Titel einer wichtigen Publikation angezeigt. Zudem lassen sich über den Button neben dem Namen einige der Person bereits zugeordnete Publikationen anzeigen.

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans Daniel

Dieter Daniel Bosshardt

Hans Daniel Schorscher

 

Weitere Publikationen von Autoren mit dem selben Namen

How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach., und . J. Informetrics, 13 (2): 643-657 (2019)Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere., und . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59 (11): 1841-1852 (2008)Count regression models in informetrics., und . J. Informetrics, 10 (1): 29-30 (2016)How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ)., und . ISSI, Seite 1098-1109. Edizioni Efesto, (2019)Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity.. Learn. Publ., 18 (2): 143-148 (2005)Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry., und . Learn. Publ., 24 (4): 325-328 (2011)Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry., , , und . Scientometrics, 89 (3): 835-843 (2011)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication., , und . Scientometrics, 77 (3): 415-432 (2008)The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition., und . Scientometrics, 85 (3): 681-687 (2010)In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics., , , und . Scientometrics, 93 (3): 915-929 (2012)