%0 Journal Article %1 breen_how_2004 %A Breen, E %A Ghebrehewet, S %A Regan, M %A Thomson, A P J %D 2004 %J Communicable Disease and Public Health / PHLS %K Adolescent, Adult, Care, Child, Confidence Disease England, Factors False Health Humans, Infections, Intervals, Meningococcal Notification, Positive Quality Reactions, Retrospective Sensitivity Specificity, Studies, Time and of %N 4 %P 334--338 %T How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification? %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15779802 %V 7 %X Effective public health control of meningococcal disease (meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia) is dependent on complete, accurate and speedy notification. Using capture-recapture techniques this study assesses the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of meningococcal notification in a health authority. The completeness of meningococcal disease notification was 94.8\% (95\% confidence interval 93.2\% to 96.2\%); 91.2\% of cases in 2001 were notified within 24 hours of diagnosis, but 28.0\% of notifications in 2001 were false positives. Clinical staff need to be aware of the public health implications of a notification of meningococcal disease, and of failure of, or delay in notification. Incomplete or delayed notification not only leads to inaccurate data collection but also means that important public health measures may not be taken. A clinical diagnosis of meningococcal disease should be carefully considered between the clinician and the consultant in communicable disease control (CCDC). Otherwise, prophylaxis may be given unnecessarily, disease incidence inflated, and the benefits of control measures underestimated. Consultants in communicable disease control (CCDCs), in conjunction with clinical staff, should de-notify meningococcal disease if the diagnosis changes.

@article{breen_how_2004, abstract = {Effective public health control of meningococcal disease (meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia) is dependent on complete, accurate and speedy notification. Using capture-recapture techniques this study assesses the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of meningococcal notification in a health authority. The completeness of meningococcal disease notification was 94.8\% (95\% confidence interval 93.2\% to 96.2\%); 91.2\% of cases in 2001 were notified within 24 hours of diagnosis, but 28.0\% of notifications in 2001 were false positives. Clinical staff need to be aware of the public health implications of a notification of meningococcal disease, and of failure of, or delay in notification. Incomplete or delayed notification not only leads to inaccurate data collection but also means that important public health measures may not be taken. A clinical diagnosis of meningococcal disease should be carefully considered between the clinician and the consultant in communicable disease control {(CCDC).} Otherwise, prophylaxis may be given unnecessarily, disease incidence inflated, and the benefits of control measures underestimated. Consultants in communicable disease control {(CCDCs),} in conjunction with clinical staff, should de-notify meningococcal disease if the diagnosis changes.}, added-at = {2011-03-11T10:05:34.000+0100}, author = {Breen, E and Ghebrehewet, S and Regan, M and Thomson, A P J}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/232b9cdcb423adab7a2458455a2e83c7d/jelias}, interhash = {8ca5ad82c38e344d7aef0ce8004eea3b}, intrahash = {32b9cdcb423adab7a2458455a2e83c7d}, issn = {1462-1843}, journal = {Communicable Disease and Public Health / {PHLS}}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Care, Child, Confidence Disease England, Factors False Health Humans, Infections, Intervals, Meningococcal Notification, Positive Quality Reactions, Retrospective Sensitivity Specificity, Studies, Time and of}, month = dec, note = {{PMID:} 15779802}, number = 4, pages = {334--338}, timestamp = {2011-03-11T10:06:29.000+0100}, title = {How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?}, url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15779802}, volume = 7, year = 2004 }