Promether marks the end of surveillance and brings about a new era of online privacy,security, and anonymity. By merging blockchain technology, decentralized networks, and state-of-the-art encryption, Promether gives power and control back to the users.
'Just doing it' - not waiting upon national governments and international organizations to take action - has led to a remarkable outpouring of initiatives around the global environmental crisis. We explore James Gustave Speth's vision of unscripted, volu
Hyperlinking is the foundation of the web. As users add new content, and new sites, it is bound in to the structure of the web by other users discovering the content and linking to it. Much as synapses form in the brain, with associations becoming stronge
[Web] surfing mimics a postmodern, deconstructionist perspective by undermining the authority of texts...no longer awed by received authority...in the form of text, graphics, music or code...[web surfers will use them] for their own purposes.
Building a centralized database to process billions of open-ended queries per day is a mammoth undertaking. It appears that Google, who perhaps is the only company on the planet with enough imagination, incentive, and expertise to effectively build such a
OpenID is a lightweight, decentralized identity system that has been gaining prominence. I expect this upcoming year to be a big year for OpenID -- and not just because of the Google trend chart with the recent uptake in search query share.
We need solutions that can help the many people whose terms and vocabulary are left out of the taxonomy... The simple idea that people’s actions model meaning better than a directory (even a flexible directory) is a critical step forward in thinking ab
Narita. IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume VI (Issue VI):
117-128(November 2019)1. Symantec, 2019 Internet Security Threat Report, Vol. 24, 2019. 2. Akamai, 2019 State of the Internet / Security: Media Under Assault, 2019. https://www.akamai.com 3. J. Xia, S. Vangala, J. Wu, L. Gao, and K. Kwiat, “Effective Worm Detection for Various Scan Technique,” Journal of Computer Security, vol.14, no.4, pp.359–387, 2006. 4. W. Yu, X. Wang, X. Fu, D. Xuan, and W. Zhao, “An Invisible Localization Attack to Internet Threat Monitors,” IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol.20, no.11, pp.1611–1625, 2009. 5. M. Narita, K. Ogura, B.B. Bista, and T. Takata, “Evaluating a Dynamic Internet Threat Monitoring Method for Preventing PN Code-Based Localization Attack,” Proc. 17th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS 2014), 2014. 6. M. Narita, B.B. Bista, and T. Takata, “A Practical Study on Noise-Tolerant PN Code-Based Localisation Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors,” Int. J. Space-Based and Situated Computing, vol.3, no.4, pp.215–226, December 2013. 7. W. Yu, S. Wei, G. Ma, X. Fu, and N. Zhang, “On Effective Localization Attacks Against Internet Threat Monitors,” Proc. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp.2011–2015, 2013. 8. UCSD Network Telescope. https://www.caida.org/projects/network telescope/ 9. Guillot, R. Fontugne, P. Winter, P. Me´rindol, A. King, A. Dainotti, and C. Pelsser, “Chocolatine: Outage Detection for Internet Background Radiation,” 10. Proc. Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), June 2019. DShield. http://www.dshield.org/ 11. M. Eto, D. Inoue, J. Song, J. Nakazato, K. Ohtaka, and K. Nakao, “nicter: A Large-Scale Network Incident Analysis System: Case Studies for Understanding Threat Landscape,” Proc. 1st Workshop on Building Analysis Datasets and Gathering Experience Returns for Security, pp.37–45, 2011. 12. D. Inoue, M. Eto, K. Suzuki, M. Suzuki, and K. Nakao, “DAEDALUS-VIZ: Novel Real-Time 3D Visualization for Darknet Monitoring-Based Alert System,” Proc. 9th International Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security, pp.72–79, October 2012. 13. H. Kanehara, Y. Murakami, J. Shimamura, T. Takahashi, D. Inoue and N. Murata, “Real-time botnet detection using nonnegative tucker decomposition,” 14. Proc. the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, pp.1337–1344, April 2019. 15. X. Fan, C. Li, and X. Dong, “ A Real-Time Network Security Visualization System Based on Incremental Learning (ChinaVis 2018),” J. Visualization, pp.1–15, October 2018. 16. Y. Shinoda, K. Ikai, and M. Itoh, “Vulnerabilities of Passive Internet Threat Monitors,” Proc. 14th USENIX Security Symposium, pp.209–224, 2005. 17. J. Bethencourt, J. Franklin, and M. Vernon, “Mapping Internet Sensors with Probe Response Attacks,” Proc. 14th USENIX Security Symposium, pp.193– 208, 2005. 18. S. Wei, D. Shen, L. Ge, W. Yu, E.P. Blasch, K.D. Pham, and G. Chen, “Secured Network Sensor-Based Defense System,” Proc. SPIE 9469, Sensors and Systems for Space Applications VIII, 2015. 19. W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Fu, R. Bettati, and W. Zhao, “Localization Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors: Modeling and Countermeasures,” IEEE Trans. Computers, vol.59, no.12, pp.1655–1668, 2010. 20. ENISA, “Proactive Detection of Network Security Incidents, Report,” https://www.enisa.europa.eu/2011. 21. M. Kamizono et al., “anti Malware engineering WorkShop ~MWS Datasets 2015~,” MWS2015, 2015..
F. Hermann, A. Schuller, S. Thiel, C. Knecht, and S. Scerri. Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Contexts of Use, volume 8006 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2013)
C. Trattner, P. Singer, D. Helic, and M. Strohmaier. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, page 14:1--14:8. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2012)
M. Heupel, S. Scerri, M. Bourimi, and D. Kesdogan. Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Modeling Social Media, page 3:1--3:4. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2013)