Article investigating roles played by young siblings close in age in each others’ literacy development arguing for a unique reciprocity in learning between older and younger child.
*from Abstract* Maybin, Janet; Mercer, Neil and Stierer, Barry (1992). 'Scaffolding': learning in the classroom. In: Norman, Kate ed. Thinking Voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton, pp. 186–195.
Proponents and practitioners of the open web also bear responsibility for the missed opportunities in higher education. In retrospect, temperamental preferences for DIY culture, relentless tinkering and experimentation, and indulging the delightful paradoxes of ill-structured problems has not served to promote the adoption of open online tools in the wider culture. Whereas innovators and early adopters tend to have a relatively high tolerance for chaos, higher education as a whole does not (and arguably cannot). Railing against the academy's failure to embrace a perceived risk can be dismal fun for many of us, but an honest appraisal of our own missteps has to be in the mix.
J. Vollebregt, J. Metz, M. de Haan, M. Richir, J. Hugtenburg, and T. de Vries. British journal of clinical pharmacology, 61 (3):
345-51(March 2006)4838<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20081120; JID: 7503323; OID: NLM: PMC1885029; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>PRESCRIMIR.
S. Straus, and R. Haynes. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 180 (9):
942-5(April 2009)5074<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>EBM.