Overview
The Context Toolkit aims at facilitating the development and deployment
of context-aware applications.
By context, we mean environmental information that is part of
an application's operating environment and that can be sensed by the application.
The Context Toolkit consists of context widgets and a distributed infrastructure
that hosts the widgets. Context widgets are software components
that provide applications with access to context information while hiding
the details of context sensing.
In the same way GUI widgets insulate applications from some presentation
concerns, context widgets insulate applications from context acquisition
concerns.
To summarize, the services of the Context Toolkit are:
encapsulation of sensors
access to context data through a network API
abstraction of context data through interpreters
sharing of context data through a distributed infrastructure
storage of context data, including history
basic access control for privacy protection
PGP and GnuPG have been utilizing webs of trust to establish authenticity without a centralized certificate authority for a while. Now, a new tool seeks to extend the concept to include scientific publications. The idea is that researchers can review and sign each others' works with varying levels of endorsement, and display the signed reviews with their vitas. This creates a decentralized social network linking researchers, papers, and reviews that, in theory, represents the scientific community. It meshes seamlessly with traditional publication venues. One can publish a paper with an established journal, and still try to get more out of the paper by asking colleagues to review the work. The hope is that this will eventually provide an alternative method for researchers to establish credibility.
G. Guyatt, R. Haynes, R. Jaeschke, D. Cook, L. Green, C. Naylor, M. Wilson, und W. Richardson. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 284 (10):
1290-6(September 2000)7490<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; JID: 7501160; CIN: JAMA. 2000 Dec 27;284(24):3127-8. PMID: 11135773; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>EBM.
C. Boonacker, A. Hoes, K. van Liere-Visser, A. Schilder, und M. Rovers. American journal of epidemiology, 174 (2):
219-25(Juli 2011)6263<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 7910653; aheadofprint;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Comparacions múltiples.
J. du Prel, B. Röhrig, G. Hommel, und M. Blettner. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 107 (19):
343-8(Mai 2010)20532129<m:linebreak></m:linebreak> <m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 101475967; OID: NLM: PMC2881615; 2009/10/14 received; 2010/02/22 accepted; 2010/05/14 epublish; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak> <m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Anàlisi de dades.
K. Ng, und W. Peh. Singapore medical journal, 49 (11):
856-8; quiz 859(November 2008)5238<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0404516; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
T. Low, C. Hentschel, S. Polley, A. Das, H. Sack, A. Nürnberger, und S. Stober. Proceedings of the 20th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2019, Delft, The Netherlands, November 4-8, 2019, Seite 754--760. (2019)
O. Zagovora, K. Weller, M. Janosov, C. Wagner, und I. Peters. (2018)cite arxiv:1809.06299Comment: Paper presented at 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018) in Leiden, The Netherlands.
R. Kamath, R. Kamat, und S. Pujar. CORRELATING R & D EXPENDITURE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION OUTPUT USING K-MEANS CLUSTERING, 05 (01):
01- 07(Februar 2017)