when you mix different metadata you loss on quality. Yes you can merge them but then you need to square the number of dictionaries respect than languages. AArrgh
This document is written for readers who want a first impression of the capabilities of OWL. It provides an introduction to OWL by informally describing the features of each of the sublanguages of OWL.
Instead of storing one single link let's store two links, and a set of tags in the middle. Two links with their two titles and maybe their two descriptions. And one set of tags between them.
A. Rae, B. Sigurbjörnsson, and R. van Zwol. Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information, page 92--99. Paris, France, Le Centre De Hautes Etudes Internationales d'Informatique Documentaire, (2010)
K. Siorpaes, and M. Hepp. Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference on The semantic web: research and applications, page 751--766. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, (2008)
T. Green, G. Karvounarakis, and V. Tannen. PODS '07: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems, page 31--40. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2007)