( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguation of "Daniel, Hans-Dieter"

Author of the publication

copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

, , and . Scientometrics, 83 (2): 493-506 (2010)

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans Daniel

Dieter Daniel Bosshardt

Hans Daniel Schorscher

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Count regression models in informetrics., and . J. Informetrics, 10 (1): 29-30 (2016)Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere., and . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59 (11): 1841-1852 (2008)How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ)., and . ISSI, page 1098-1109. Edizioni Efesto, (2019)How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study., , and . J. Informetrics, 2 (4): 280-287 (2008)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches, , , , and . Review of Educational Research, 79 (3): 1290-1326 (September 2009)Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity.. Learn. Publ., 18 (2): 143-148 (2005)Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry., and . Learn. Publ., 24 (4): 325-328 (2011)The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition., and . Scientometrics, 85 (3): 681-687 (2010)In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics., , , and . Scientometrics, 93 (3): 915-929 (2012)How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach., and . J. Informetrics, 13 (2): 643-657 (2019)