( en | de | ru )

 

Disambiguation

From post

копироватьудалитьдобавить публикацию в буфер
A content analysis of referees' comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ?

, , и . Scientometrics, 83 (2): 493-506 (2010)

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed.

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans-Dieter Daniel

Hans Daniel

Dieter Daniel Bosshardt

Hans Daniel Schorscher

 

Другие публикации лиц с тем же именем

How to consider fractional counting and field normalization in the statistical modeling of bibliometric data: A multilevel Poisson regression approach., и . J. Informetrics, 13 (2): 643-657 (2019)Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere., и . J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 59 (11): 1841-1852 (2008)Introduction: Quantitative science and technology indicators studies in the Federal Republic of Germany., и . Scientometrics, 19 (5-6): 327-329 (1990)How Should We Measure Individual Researcher's Performance Capacity Within and Between Universities? - Social Sciences as an Example? A Multilevel Extension of the Bibliometric Quotient (BQ)., и . ISSI, стр. 1098-1109. Edizioni Efesto, (2019)Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry., , , и . Scientometrics, 89 (3): 835-843 (2011)Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists' productivity.. Learn. Publ., 18 (2): 143-148 (2005)Seasonal bias in editorial decisions? A study using data from chemistry., и . Learn. Publ., 24 (4): 325-328 (2011)The validity of staff editors' initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition., и . Scientometrics, 85 (3): 681-687 (2010)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication., , и . Scientometrics, 77 (3): 415-432 (2008)In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics., , , и . Scientometrics, 93 (3): 915-929 (2012)