We introduce Vicuna-13B, an open-source chatbot trained by fine-tuning LLaMA on user-shared conversations collected from ShareGPT. Preliminary evaluation using GPT-4 as a judge shows Vicuna-13B achieves more than 90%* quality of OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Bard while outperforming other models like LLaMA and Stanford Alpaca in more than 90%* of cases. The cost of training Vicuna-13B is around $300. The code and weights, along with an online demo, are publicly available for non-commercial use.
The ultimate guide to chatbot analytics. Find out what bot metrics and KPIs you should measure and discover easy ways to optimize your chatbot performance.
These measurements are indispensable for tracking the results of your chatbot, identifying any stumbling blocks and continuously improving its performance. But which metrics should you choose?
This is a sequel test after the chemical analysis and microbiological procedures have been conducted. The study determined the level of acceptability of the by-product of Talisay (Terminalia catappa) nuts specifically; Talisay Nuts Polvoron, Glazed Talisay Nuts, and Sugar-coated Talisay Nuts using sensory evaluation as to appearance, taste, aroma, sweetness, and texture. The responses of the food inclined participants are described yielding from the Hedonic Tests conducted and statistically treated. Results concluded that the developed products are remarkably acceptable and marketable.
The Experience API (xAPI) allows us to collect data about any type of learning experience or activity, but does that mean we should? Should we generate massive amounts of xAPI data for every possible type of interaction and then expect to make sense of it all later? This approach can be costly in terms of data storage, but also in terms of your time.
Sunday Blake dives into the latest in learning analytics and engagement data, and asks how universities can act upon it to make our interactions with students more human.
In dieser Fortsetzungsfolge zum Thema Learning Analytics erläutern Marius Wehner und Lynn Schmodde von der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf das Verbundprojekt Fair Enough. Zur Fairness von Learning Analytics-Systemen legen sie empirische Evaluationsergebnisse verschiedener Stakeholder-Gruppen dar und geben einen Ausblick auf zukünftige Entwicklungen. Interviewer in Folge 12 des DINItus Podcasts ist Erik Reidt vom ZIM/Multimediazentrum der HHU Düsseldorf.
Z. Bucinca, P. Lin, K. Gajos, and E. Glassman. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, page 454-464. ACM, (March 2020)
E. Breck, J. Burger, L. Ferro, L. Hirschman, D. House, M. Light, and I. Mani. (2000)cite arxiv:cs/0004008Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures, to appear in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2000).
M. Ge, C. Delgado-Battenfeld, and D. Jannach. Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems - RecSys \textquotesingle10, page 257-260. ACM Press, (2010)
R. Rei, C. Stewart, A. Farinha, and A. Lavie. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), page 2685--2702. Online, Association for Computational Linguistics, (November 2020)
R. Snow, B. O'Connor, D. Jurafsky, and A. Ng. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, page 254--263. Honolulu, Hawaii, Association for Computational Linguistics, (October 2008)
R. Canamares, and P. Castells. Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, page 259–268. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (2020)
M. Ochsner, S. Hug, and H. Daniel (Eds.) SpringerLinkSpringer eBook Collection Springer, Cham, (2016)Paketwechsel, der Titel wurde zuerst für ZDB-2-EDA, Jahr 2016 ausgeliefert (SWB); This book analyses and discusses the recent developments for assessing research quality in the humanities and related fields in the social sciences. Research assessments in the humanities are highly controversial and the evaluation of humanities research is delicate. While citation-based research performance indicators are widely used in the natural and life sciences, quantitative measures for research performance meet strong opposition in the humanities. This volume combines the presentation of state-of-the-art projects on research assessments in the humanities by humanities scholars themselves with a description of the evaluation of humanities research in practice presented by research funders. Bibliometric issues concerning humanities research complete the exhaustive analysis of humanities research assessment. The selection of authors is well-balanced between humanities scholars, research funders, and researchers on higher education. Hence, the edited volume succeeds in painting a comprehensive picture of research evaluation in the humanities. This book is valuable to university and science policy makers, university administrators, research evaluators, bibliometricians as well as humanities scholars who seek expert knowledge in research evaluation in the humanities.
L. Arras, A. Osman, K. Müller, and W. Samek. Proceedings of the 2019 ACL Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, page 113--126. Florence, Italy, Association for Computational Linguistics, (August 2019)
B. Letham, C. Rudin, T. McCormick, and D. Madigan. (2015)cite arxiv:1511.01644Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/15-AOAS848 in the Annals of Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org).
R. Roberts, S. Marr, M. Homer, and J. Noble. 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, volume 134 of ECOOP'19, page 5:1--5:28. Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, (Jul 15, 2019)
C. Brauer, C. Bauer, and M. Dirlinger. 1st International Conference on HCI in Business in conjunction with 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCIB/HCII 2014), volume 8527 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), Springer, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, (June 2014)