BibSonomy :: tag  ::

order by ( date | folkrank )

The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a general-purpose language for representing information in the Web. This document defines a textual syntax f...The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a general-purpose language for representing information in the Web. This document defines a textual syntax for RDF called Turtle that allows RDF graphs to be completely written in a compact and natural text form, with abbreviations for common usage patterns and datatypes. Turtle provides levels of compatibility with the existing N-Triples and Notation 3 formats as well as the triple pattern syntax of the SPARQL W3C Proposed Recommendation. This document specifies a language that is in common usage under the name "Turtle". It is intended to be compatible with, and a subset of, Notation 3.

Learn French Best and Fast is Possible! With a good online system that teaches you interactively and practice you will be speaking French fluently and fast...Learn French Best and Fast is Possible! With a good online system that teaches you interactively and practice you will be speaking French fluently and fast. It will boost your career like no other language.

There is a large number of advantages to learn Beginner Spanish Lessons online. It's convenient, accessible, affordable and easier then ever.

OmegaT is a free translation memory application written in Java. It is a tool intended for professional translators. It does not translate for you! (Softwa...OmegaT is a free translation memory application written in Java. It is a tool intended for professional translators. It does not translate for you! (Software that does this is called "machine translation", and you will have to look elsewhere for it.) OmegaT has the following features: * Fuzzy matching * Match propagation * Simultaneous processing of multiple-file projects * Simultaneous use of multiple translation memories * External glossaries * Document file formats include: XHTML and HTML Microsoft Office 2007 XML OpenOffice.org/StarOffice XLIFF (Okapi) MediaWiki (Wikipedia) Plain text * Unicode (UTF-8) support: can be used with non-Latin alphabets * Support for right-to-left languages * Compatible with other translation memory applications (TMX)

Introduction The goals of this project are simple: Create a highly configurable, easily modifiable source code beautifier. Features * Ident co...Introduction The goals of this project are simple: Create a highly configurable, easily modifiable source code beautifier. Features * Ident code, aligning on parens, assignments, etc * Align on '=' and variable definitions * Align structure initializers * Align #define stuff * Align backslash-newline stuff * Reformat comments (a little bit) * Fix inter-character spacing * Add or remove parens on return statements * Add or remove braces on single-statement if/do/while/for statements * Supports embedded SQL 'EXEC SQL' stuff * Highly configurable - 168 configurable options as of version 0.30

Speech technology potentially allows everyone to participate in today's information revolution and can bridge the language barrier gap. Unfortunately, cons...Speech technology potentially allows everyone to participate in today's information revolution and can bridge the language barrier gap. Unfortunately, construction of speech processing systems requires significant resources. With some 6900 languages in the world, traditionally speech processing is prohibitive to all but the most economically viable languages. In spite of recent improvements in speech processing, supporting new languages is a skilled job requiring significant effort from trained individuals. SPICE aims to overcome both limitations by providing an interactive language creation and evaluation toolkit that allows everyone to develop speech processing models, to collect appropriate data for model building, and to evaluate the results enabling iterative improvements.

Features * (Jointly) visualize o syntactic dependency graphs o semantic dependency graphs (a la CoNLL 2008) o Chunk...Features * (Jointly) visualize o syntactic dependency graphs o semantic dependency graphs (a la CoNLL 2008) o Chunks (such as syntactic chunks, NER chunks, SRL chunks etc.) * Compare gold standard trees to your generated trees (e.g. highlight false positive and negative dependency edges) * Filter trees and visualize only what's necessary, for example o only dependency edges with certain labels o only the edges between certain tokens * Search corpora for sentences with certain attributes using powerful search expressions, for example o search for all sentences that contain the word "vantage" and the pos tag sequence DT NN o search for all sentences that contain false positive edges and the word "vantage" * Reads o CoNLL 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 and 2008 format o Lisp S-Expressions o Malt-Tab format o markov thebeast format * Export to EPS Check this screenshot to get a better idea.

Any set of statistics about word frequencies in Latin will inevitably be, in the absence of a survey covering all classical texts (however one might define...Any set of statistics about word frequencies in Latin will inevitably be, in the absence of a survey covering all classical texts (however one might define "classical" or "text"), a function of the specific works and passages chosen for the database. This collection is drawn from two word counts made much earlier in this century...

These lists were compiled from a largely prose corpus of about 5.3 million Latin words, including many post-classical sources. In this second edition, the ...These lists were compiled from a largely prose corpus of about 5.3 million Latin words, including many post-classical sources. In this second edition, the many repetitions of the first edition have largely been eliminated, along with numerals and contractions, but the proper names have been retained. Also, the letters v and j have all been converted into the letters u and i. Thus the numeral VI was necessarily concordanced with the ablative of vis and appears as ui. For this and other reasons, these lists are only a rough approximation to the order of frequency. Note that each word's inflected forms are concordanced separately.

This specification describes the FOAF language, defined as a dictionary of named properties and classes using W3C's RDF technology.

Christine Elizabeth Wania (2008)

L. S. Vygotsky MIT Press (reprinted in 1986), Cambridge, MA, (1934)

Candia Morgan Educational Studies in Mathematics61(1):219-245(2006) http://www.springerlink.com/content/c73787843037051r/ .

Lev S. Vygotsky The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 1. Problems of general psychology, Plenum Press, New York, (1987)

L. Steels Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(7):308--312(2003)

L.L. Steels and M. Loetzsch and M.S. Spranger (2007)

Luc Steels (2004)

Luc Steels and Joris Bleys (2005)

Luc Steels and Tony Belpaeme Behavioral and Brain Sciences28(04):469-489(2005)

Luc Steels Connection Science17(3):213-230(2005)

Luc Steels Symbols, embodiment and meaning. Academic Press, New Haven(2008)

Luc Steels and Frederic Kaplan Evolution of Communication4(1):3-32(2000)

Charmian Kenner and Gunther Kress and Hayat Al-Khatib and Roy Kam and Kuan-Chun Tsai Language and Education18(2):124--144(2004)

Charmian Kenner Language and Education13(1):1-16(1999)

Charmian Kenner Literacy40(1):60--61(2006)

Charmian Kenner Bilingual Education and Bilingualism7(1):43-61(2004)

S. L. Small and W. Schneider and D. C. Noll and C. A. Perfetti (1994)

B. A. Shaywitz and S. E. Shaywitz and K. R. Pugh and T. R. Constable and P. Skudlarski and R. K. Fulbright and R. A. Bronen and J. M. Fletcher and D. P. Shankweiler and L. Katz and J. C. Gore Nature373(February 16):607-609(1995)

M. S. Seidenberg and J. L. Elman Trends in Cognitive Sciences3(8):288-289(1999) With reply by G. Marcus .