P. van Dokkum, C. Conroy, A. Villaume, J. Brodie, and A. Romanowsky. (2016)cite arxiv:1611.09859Comment: Submitted to ApJ. Figure 12 shows the average IMF as a function of radius. Figure 16 compares our results to dynamical and lensing constraints.
S. Kotuš, M. Murphy, and R. Carswell. (2016)cite arxiv:1609.03860Comment: 27 pages, 10 figures. Accepted by MNRAS. Quasar spectra and absorption profile fits are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51715.
B. Brewer, P. Marshall, M. Auger, T. Treu, A. Dutton, and M. Barnabè. (2013)cite arxiv:1310.5177Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 15 pages, 8 figures. Code available at https://github.com/eggplantbren/SWELLS_Hierarchical.
P. van Dokkum, and C. Conroy. (2012)cite arxiv:1205.6471Comment: Submitted to the Astrophysical Journal. 14 pages, 12 figures. With an Appendix re-examining van Dokkum (2008).
J. King, J. Webb, M. Murphy, V. Flambaum, R. Carswell, M. Bainbridge, M. Wilczynska, and F. Koch. (2012)cite arxiv:1202.4758
Comment: 47 pages, 35 figures. Accepted for publication by Monthly Notices of
the Royal Astronomical Society. Please see
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~mmurphy/pub.html for an ASCII version of table
A1 and the full set of Voigt profile fits for appendix C.