( en | de | ru )

 

  2. user
  3. @quinn
  4. choice

bookmarks  

    No matching posts.
  • ⟨⟨
  • ⟨
  • ⟩
  • ⟩⟩

publications  3  

  •  

    , and . Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50 (6): 404-409 (June 2006)MT: Electronic; Print; FO: Electronic; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Young-Adulthood (18-29-yrs); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; TM: Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities Test; CRN: Number of References: 9; Displayed: 9.; REF: Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, D. C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002) Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences on persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 35, 49-58. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992) A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 25, 491-8. Harapiak, S. M., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. C. T. (1999) Hierarchical ordering of auditory discriminates and the assessment of basic learning abilities test. Journal on Developmental Disabilities 6, 32-50. Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J. (1977) The measurement of motor, visual, and auditory discrimination skills. Rehabilitation Psychology 24, 95-112. Kilsby, M., Bennert, K., & Beyer, S. (2002) Measuring and reducing acquiescence in vocational profiling procedures for first time job-seekers with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 17, 287-99. Mason, S. A., McGee, G. G., Farmer-Dougan, V., & Risley, T. R. (1989) A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 22, 171-9. Parsons, M. B., Harper, V. N., Jensen, J. M., & Reid, D. H. (1997) Assisting older adults with severe disabilities in expressing leisure preferences: a protocol for determining choice-making skills. Research in Developmental Disabilities 18, 113-26. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(96)00044-3 Richman, D. M., Wacker, D. P., Cooper-Brown, L. J., Kayser, K., Crosland, K., Stephens, T. J., & Ausmus, J. (2001) Stimulus characteristics within directives: effects on accuracy of task completion. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 34, 289-312. Worsdell, A. S., Iwata, B. A., & Wallace, M. D. (2002) Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 35, 287-90..
    18 years ago by @quinn
     
      presentationdiscriminationPerceptualTaskskills;behaviorchoicetasks;disabilityStimulusMethods;method;preferencedevelopmentalAnalysis
      (0)
      copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
       
       
    •  

      , , , , , , and . American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110 (2): 145-154 (March 2005)MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; TM: Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test; CRN: Number of References: 16; Displayed: 16.; REF: Cohen-Almeida, D., Graff, R. B., & Ahearn, W. H. (2000). A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 329-334. Conyers, C., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficiency of the three presentation methods for assessing performances of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533. Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. S., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comprehension of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498. Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (1999). The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 63-72. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(98)00032-8 Higbee, T. S., Carr, J. E., & Harrison, C. D. (2000). Further evaluation of the multiple-stimulus preference assessment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 61-73. doi:10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00030-X Hughes, C., Pitkin, S. E., & Lorden, S. W. (1998). Assessing preferences and choices of persons with severe and profound mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 299-316. Logan, K. R., & Gast, D. L. (2001). Conducting preference assessments and reinforcer testing for individuals with profound multiple disabilities: Issues and procedures. Exceptionality, 9, 123-134. Lohrmann-O'Rourke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1032.0.CO;2 Marion, C., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., Sakko, G., & Walters, K. (2003). The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 91-105. Martin, G. L., & Pear, P. (2003). Behaviour modification: What it is and how to do it (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Martin, G. L., & Yu, C. T. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test Special Issue. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 10-36. Northup, J., George, T., Jones, K., Broussard, C., & Vollmer, T. R. (1996). A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: The utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 201-212. Richards, D. F., Williams, W. L., & Follette, W. C. (2002). Two new empirically derived reasons to use the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 329-339. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2002)1072.0.CO;2 Schwartzman, L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2003). Choice responding as a function of choice presentation method and level of preference in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community, and Rehabilitation, 1(3), Article 3. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL01_03_CAN/articles/schwartzman.shtml Windsor, J., Piche, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439-455..
      18 years ago by @quinn
       
        discriminationStimuliStimulation;leisureTime;stimulusskills;behaviorPictorialassessmentchoiceStimulusdisabilityStimuli;TactualVerbalactivities;preferencedevelopmentalmodalities;
        (0)
        copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
         
         
      •  

        , and . Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 10 (1): 137-140 (Fal 2003 2003)MT: Electronic; Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; MD: Literature-Review; CRN: Number of References: 13; Displayed: 13.; REF: Conyers, C. M., Doole, A., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Yu, D. C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2002). Predicting the relative efficacy of three presentation methods for assessing preferences of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 49-58. DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519-533. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 15-25. Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491-498. Fisher, W. W., Thompson, R. H., Piazza, C. C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423-438. Green, C. W., Gardner, S. M., & Reid, D. H. (1997). Increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities: A program replication and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 217-228. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., Canipe, V. S., & Gardner, S. M. (1991). A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 537-552. Green, C. W., Reid, D. H., White, L. K., Haiford, R. C., Brittain, D. P., & Gardner, S. M. (1988). Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: Staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 31-43. Hughes, C., Hwang, B., Kim, J. H., Eisenman, L. T., & Killian, D. J. (1995). Quality of life in applied research: A review and analysis of empirical measures. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 623-641. Lohrmann-O'Rouke, S., & Browder, D. M. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103, 146-161. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1032.0.CO;2 Martin, G., & Yu, C. T. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test Special Issue. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 10-36. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255. Schwartzman, L., Yu, C. T., & Martin, G. L. (2003). Choice responding as a function of choice-presentation method and level of preference in persons with developmental disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Community & Rehabilitation, 1, 1-7..
        18 years ago by @quinn
         
          caregivers;descriptions;responding;stimulusbehaviortangibles;Pictorialpictures;choicedisabilityStimuli;Skillsmodalities;developmentalverbalcommunication
          (0)
          copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
           
           
        • ⟨⟨
        • ⟨
        • 1
        • ⟩
        • ⟩⟩