This article suggests that there is a tendency to argue for or against bilingual education in terms of productivity (student attainment expressed as test scores), and that productivity is discussed in terms of division of time, curriculum and speakers. Although this orientation has produced some valuable macro-level accounts, it does not address the need for close-up interaction data showing how language(s) are used by teachers and students in classroom activities. It is argued that such data is vital for understanding language and curriculum content learning in specific local contexts, which in turn can be fed into wider discussions on pedagogy and policy in bilingual education.
Description
Explores bilingual teaching and learning and suggests that many macro level studies tend to overlook classroom/real life situations, so may not have the full picture. Suggests that both levels need to be researched.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Leung2005238
%A Leung, Constant
%D 2005
%J Linguistics and Education
%K 2015_E852 bilingual classroom contentbasedpedagogy l2
%N 2
%P 238 - 252
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.004
%T Language and content in bilingual education
%U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589806000192
%V 16
%X This article suggests that there is a tendency to argue for or against bilingual education in terms of productivity (student attainment expressed as test scores), and that productivity is discussed in terms of division of time, curriculum and speakers. Although this orientation has produced some valuable macro-level accounts, it does not address the need for close-up interaction data showing how language(s) are used by teachers and students in classroom activities. It is argued that such data is vital for understanding language and curriculum content learning in specific local contexts, which in turn can be fed into wider discussions on pedagogy and policy in bilingual education.
@article{Leung2005238,
abstract = {This article suggests that there is a tendency to argue for or against bilingual education in terms of productivity (student attainment expressed as test scores), and that productivity is discussed in terms of division of time, curriculum and speakers. Although this orientation has produced some valuable macro-level accounts, it does not address the need for close-up interaction data showing how language(s) are used by teachers and students in classroom activities. It is argued that such data is vital for understanding language and curriculum content learning in specific local contexts, which in turn can be fed into wider discussions on pedagogy and policy in bilingual education. },
added-at = {2015-11-25T12:05:38.000+0100},
author = {Leung, Constant},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/283c8ef6b8ad558b7b94062c2aede0c3d/umatadema},
description = {Explores bilingual teaching and learning and suggests that many macro level studies tend to overlook classroom/real life situations, so may not have the full picture. Suggests that both levels need to be researched.},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.004},
interhash = {e885b38ed0d3a501238c9b07fcb14a58},
intrahash = {83c8ef6b8ad558b7b94062c2aede0c3d},
issn = {0898-5898},
journal = {Linguistics and Education },
keywords = {2015_E852 bilingual classroom contentbasedpedagogy l2},
note = {Language and content in mainstream Classrooms },
number = 2,
pages = {238 - 252},
timestamp = {2015-11-30T10:12:20.000+0100},
title = {Language and content in bilingual education },
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589806000192},
volume = 16,
year = 2005
}