HRT Tactical Gear has evolved from a tactical training-only company to a tactical gear company. We feel this has given us an advantage in the industry. We not only sell these products, we actually use them in real-world scenarios. This allows us to stay competitive and deliver innovative new products in an ever-changing industry.
We can deliver superior products by sourcing quality materials and demanding unsurpassed workmanship.
In this paper, I discuss several arguments against non-therapeutic mutilation. Interventions into bodily integrity, which do not serve a therapeutic purpose and are not regarded as aesthetically acceptable by the majority, e.g. tongue splitting, branding and flesh stapling, are now practised, but, however, are still seen as a kind of 'aberration' that ought not to be allowed. I reject several arguments for a possible ban on these body modifications. I find the common pathologisation of body modifications, Kant's argument of duties to oneself and the objection from irrationality all wanting. In conclusion, I see no convincing support for prohibition of voluntary mutilations.