The objective of this document(*)
is to provide some rational, structured access to an analysis of cognitive and agent architectures (for
more information on accessing the document, see the Reader's Guide). Twelve architectures have
been used for this preliminary analysis representing a wide range of
current architectures in artificial
intelligence (AI). The aim of the project is to facilitate both
an understanding of current architectures and provide insight to the
development of future, improved intelligent agent architectures.
This work was based on publications from 1992 and before and has not
been authorized by the researchers responsible for particular
architectures (see DISCLAIMER for additional
information).
On Event Processing Agents implies a “new” event processing reference architecture with terms like,
(1) simple event processing agents for filtering and routing,
(2) mediated event processing agents for event enrichment, transformation, validation,
(3) complex event processing agents for pattern detection, and
(4) intelligent event processing agents for prediction, decisions.
Frankly, while I generally agree with the concepts, I think the terms in On Event Processing Agents tend to add to the confusion because these concepts in On Event Processing Agents are following, almost exactly, the same reference architecture (and terms) for MSDF, illustrated again below to aid the reader.
C. Key. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation Conference, 2, page 1313--1320. Orlando, Florida, USA, Morgan Kaufmann, (13-17 July 1999)
L. Coyle, P. Cunningham, and C. Hayes. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, 6th European Conference, ECCBR
2002 Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, September 4-7, 2002, Proceedings, page 505--518. Springer, (2002)
B. Savarimuthu, and S. Cranefield. Normative Multi-Agent Systems, 09121, Dagstuhl, Germany, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany, (2009)
B. Savarimuthu, S. Cranefield, M. Purvis, and M. Purvis. Agents and Data Mining Interaction, volume 5980 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg, (2010)
B. WEINRAUB, and A. BUSCH. http://ezproxy.library.wwu.edu/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=117880426&Fmt=7&clientId=9320&RQT=309&VName=PQD, (May 2002)
L. Kagal, S. Cost, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Proceedings of IJCAI-01 Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation and Control, (2001)http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/kagal01framework.html.
J. Günther, E. May, F. Münch, S. Löffler, S. Beck, and E. Hilgendorf. Leroux, Christophe; Labruto, Roberto (Hrsg.): Suggestion for a green paper on legal issues in robotics, euRobotics, The European Robotics Coordination Action., (2012)