What the Alliance is about is to try and achieve a uniform data structure that makes it possible to establish, with different levels of certainty, relationships between concepts in a given domain (we start with biomedical). The idea of a single, overarching, monolithic ontology doesn’t fit this model. Instead, several ontologies must co-exist, and yes, if combined, they can yield contradictions.
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
R. Jäschke, and S. Rudolph. Contributions to the 11th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, page 19--34. Technische Universität Dresden, (May 2013)
F. Baader, B. Ganter, B. Sertkaya, and U. Sattler. Proceedings of the 20th international joint conference on Artifical intelligence, page 230--235. San Francisco, CA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., (2007)
J. Poelmans, P. Elzinga, S. Viaene, and G. Dedene. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS 2010), volume 6208 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 139-153. Springer, (2010)
J. Poelmans, P. Elzinga, S. Viaene, and G. Dedene. Conceptual Structures: From Information to Intelligence, volume 6208 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, (2010)