Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering with Constraints: Theoretical and Empirical Results
Ian Davidson1 and S.S. Ravi1
(1) Department of Computer Science, University at Albany - State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222,
The electrochemical deposition of ZnO hierarchical nanostructures directly from PHEMA hydrogel coated electrodes has been successfully demonstrated. A variety of hierarchical ZnO nanostructures, including porous nanoflakes, nanosheets and nanopillar arrays were fabricated directly from the PHEMA hydrogel coated electrodes. Hybrid ZnO-hydrogel composite films were formed with low zinc concentration and short electrodeposition time. A dual-layer structure consisting of a ZnO/polymer and pure ZnO layer was obtained with zinc concentration above 0.01 M. SEM observations and XPS depth profiling were used to investigate ZnO nanostructure formation in the early electrodeposition process. A growth mechanism to understand the formation of ZnO/hydrogel hybrid hierarchical nanostructures was developed. The I-V characteristics of the ZnO-hydrogel composite films in dark and under ultraviolet (UV) illumination demonstrate potential applications in UV photodetection.
Show multiple parent-child relationships in an expandable, hierarchical data grid that stands as the backbone of your data-centric JavaScript-based client applications. Users can drill down, as well as add, edit, delete, select, sort, group and filter rows using their mouse or keyboard.
Most users at one time or another have dealt with hierarchical data in a SQL database and no doubt learned that the management of hierarchical data is not what a relational database is intended for. The tables of a relational database are not hierarchical
Whether you want to build your own forum, publish the messages from a mailing list on your Website, or write your own cms [1]: there will be a moment that you’ll want to store hierarchical data in a database. And, unless you’re using a XML [2]-like da
S. Bozza, and A. O'Hagan. Between Data Science and Applied Data Analysis: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft Fűr Klassifikation Ev, 26, page 165. University of Mannheim, Springer Verlag, (2003)
N. Yuruk, M. Mete, X. Xu, and T. Schweiger. ICDMW '07: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, page 441--448. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2007)
K. Friston, J. Kilner, and L. Harrison. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 100 (1-3):
70--87(2006)Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience: Understanding Brain Functions.
C. Diuk, A. Strehl, and M. Littman. AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, page 313--319. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, (2006)
R. Cilibrasi, and P. Vitany. Theory of Evolutionary Algorithms, 06061, Dagstuhl, Germany, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum fuer
Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, (5-10 February 2006)$<$http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2006/598$>$
date of citation: 2006-01-01.
J. Hu, E. Goodman, K. Seo, and M. Pei. GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Genetic and
Evolutionary Computation Conference, page 772--779. New York, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (9-13 July 2002)
M. Zhou, S. Bao, X. Wu, and Y. Yu. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC/ASWC2007), Busan, South Korea, volume 4825 of LNCS, page 673--686. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, (November 2007)
M. Zhou, S. Bao, X. Wu, and Y. Yu. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference and 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference (ISWC/ASWC2007), Busan, South Korea, volume 4825 of LNCS, page 673--686. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, (November 2007)
X. Liu, and W. Croft. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, page 186--193. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
X. Liu, and W. Croft. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, page 186--193. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
N. Fanizzi, C. d'Amato, and F. Esposito. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 5th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, June 1-5, 2008, Proceedings, page 318-332. Springer, (2008)
N. Tomuro, and A. Shepitsen. Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on The People's Web Meets NLP: Collaboratively Constructed Semantic Resources, page 42--50. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2009)
C. Baziotis, N. Pelekis, and C. Doulkeridis. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), page 390-395. Association for Computational Linguistics, (2017)
R. Campello, D. Moulavi, and J. Sander. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, page 160--172. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2013)
A. Lancichinetti, S. Fortunato, and J. Kertesz. (2008)cite arxiv:0802.1218
Comment: 20 pages, 8 figures. Final version published on New Journal of
Physics.