In the fast-paced world of social media, TikTok has emerged as a platform where creativity knows no bounds. With its rapid growth and millions of users, getting more TikTok views has become a goal for many content creators. In this article, we'll delve into 10 proven strategies that will help you boost your TikTok views…
Skeble Technologies is one of the Best Digital marketing Agency and Top Digital Marketing Company in R T Nagar, Bangalore, India. We thrive on our client's success and aim to become the best digital marketing agency.More Information Contact Us:
This article provides an introduction to the use of altmetrics as a tool to assess research impact. In particular, it looks at the evidence behind claims that altmetrics allow the impact of research to be measured in days rather than years. Low correlations between altmetrics and article citations make it doubtful that altmetrics can reliably predict future citations. In addition, there are good reasons to qualify statements that altmetrics measure the wider impact of research on society. Librarians should be careful not to overstate the value of altmetrics when recommending their use as a complement to more traditional measures of research quality.
This paper presents a review of altmetrics or alternative metrics. This concept is defined as the creation and study of new indicators for analysing scientific and academic research activity based onWeb 2.0. The underlying premise is that variables such as mentions in blogs, numberof tweets or saves ofan articleby researchersin reference management systems, may be a valid measure of the use and impactof scientific publications. In this respect,these measuresare becoming particularly relevant, being at the centre of debate within the bibliometric community. Firstly,an explanation is given of the main platforms and indicators for this type of measurement. Subsequently,a study is undertaken of a selection of papers from the field of communication, comparing the number of citations received withtheir 2.0 indicators.The results show that the most cited articles within recent years also have significantly higher altmetric indicators. Next follows a review of the principal empirical studies undertaken, centering on the correlations between bibliometric and alternative indicators. To conclude, the main limitations of altmetrics are highlighted,alongside a reflective consideration of the role altmetrics may play in capturing the impactof research in Web 2.0 platforms.
Alternative metrics demonstrate the value and influence of scholars’ work apart fromtraditional citation counts and can enhance the impact of a CV. Altmetrics provideadditional, supplementary information and can balance misleading metrics tied toparticular journals. More timely than traditional metrics, altmetrics quickly reveal theimpact of recent work and add authority to different types of scholarly products notcaptured as articles. Altmetrics can capture social media references that escape traditionalmetrics and reflect public engagement prompted by scholarly writing. The availability ofaltmetrics expands publishing opportunities to include new venues and stimulatesinnovative strategies for evaluating research. When included in a CV altmetrics must beaccurate, clear and meaningful
Although the conceptual core of information literacy (IL), with its emphasis on acquiring abilities that enable one to ethically seek, use and create information, has remained quite stable since the term was first introduced, recent...
D. Liben-Nowell, and J. Kleinberg. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM \textquotesingle03, ACM Press, (2003)
P. Singer, D. Helic, A. Hotho, and M. Strohmaier. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, page 1003--1013. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, (2015)
A. Hotho, R. Jaeschke, and K. Lerman. Semantic Web, 8 (5):
623--624(April 2017)2017 IOS Press and the authors. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Semantic Web. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy..
A. Hotho, R. Jaeschke, and K. Lerman. Semantic Web, 8 (5):
623--624(April 2017)2017 IOS Press and the authors. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Semantic Web. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy..
F. Freitas, J. Leitão, N. Preguiça, and R. Rodrigues. 2016 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), page 638-645. (June 2016)
H. SalahEldeen, and M. Nelson. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, page 125--137. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, (2012)
K. Cortis, S. Scerri, I. Rivera, and S. Handschuh. Social Informatics, volume 8238 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, (2013)
T. Niebler, M. Becker, D. Zoller, S. Doerfel, and A. Hotho. Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2016)forthcoming.
P. Heim, D. Thom, and T. Ertl. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Semantic Models for Adaptive Interactive Systems (SEMAIS), Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, (2011)
S. Tramp, P. Frischmuth, T. Ermilov, and S. Auer. Proceedings of the EKAW 2010 - Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management by the Masses; 11th October-15th October 2010 - Lisbon, Portugal, volume 6317 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, page 135--149. Berlin / Heidelberg, Springer, (October 2010)
B. Berendt, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 8 (2-3):
95 - 96(2010)Bridging the Gap--Data Mining and Social Network Analysis for Integrating Semantic Web and Web 2.0; The Future of Knowledge Dissemination: The Elsevier Grand Challenge for the Life Sciences.
B. Hoser, A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, volume 4011 of LNCS, page 514-529. Budva, Montenegro, Springer, (June 2006)
B. Hoser, A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Proceedings of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, volume 4011 of LNCS, page 514-529. Budva, Montenegro, Springer, (June 2006)
B. Berendt, A. Hotho, and G. Stumme. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 8 (2-3):
95 - 96(2010)Bridging the Gap--Data Mining and Social Network Analysis for Integrating Semantic Web and Web 2.0; The Future of Knowledge Dissemination: The Elsevier Grand Challenge for the Life Sciences.
J. Freyne, S. Anand, I. Guy, and A. Hotho. Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, page 383--384. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2011)
R. Kaptein, P. Serdyukov, and J. Kamps. Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, page 839--840. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2010)
F. Abel, N. Henze, E. Herder, and D. Krause. User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, volume 6075 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2010)
A. Muralidharan, Z. Gyongyi, and E. Chi. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 1085--1094. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2012)
K. McKelvey, and F. Menczer. Proc. First Intl. Web Observatory Workshop (WOW), Companion Publication of the WWW 2013 Conference, page 1351--1357. (2013)http://wow.oerc.ox.ac.uk/ http://cnets.indiana.edu/wp-content/uploads/truthy-wow.pdf.
F. Abel, E. Herder, and D. Krause. Proc. AUM 2011 - Workshop on Augmenting User Models with Real World Experiences to Enhance Personalization and Adaptation, co-located with UMAP 2011., (2011)