The big data revolution is an exciting opportunity for universities, which typically have rich and complex digital data on their learners. It has motivated many universities around the world to invest in the development and implementation of learning analytics dashboards (LADs).
S. Fatahi, M. Mousavifar, und J. Vassileva. Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 66-77. ACM, (Juni 2023)
K. Gajos, und L. Mamykina. 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Seite 794-806. ACM, (März 2022)Interesting.. Explanations could help you to choose for yourself and learn. Just like we do in MG.
Y. Jin, N. Htun, N. Tintarev, und K. Verbert. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, ACM, (Juni 2019)
S. Zhang, und K. Balog. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &$\mathsemicolon$ Data Mining, Seite 1512-1520. ACM, (August 2020)
A. Ajalloeian, M. Vlachos, J. Schneider, und A. Steinmann. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information &$\mathsemicolon$ Knowledge Management, Seite 2853-2862. ACM, (Oktober 2022)Very interesting case of recommendations. Music to play... Need to have skill level and also same music could be recommended many times....
Y. Qin, P. Wang, B. Ma, und Z. Zhang. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information &$\mathsemicolon$ Knowledge Management, Seite 1655–1665. ACM, (Oktober 2022)
N. Hazrati, und F. Ricci. Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 95-98. ACM, (Juli 2022)
S. Eden, A. Livne, O. Shalom, B. Shapira, und D. Jannach. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 99-109. ACM, (Juli 2022)
M. Chatti, M. Guesmi, L. Vorgerd, T. Ngo, S. Joarder, Q. Ain, und A. Muslim. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 254-264. ACM, (Juli 2022)Several detail-levels of explanations and their match to individual differences.
D. Zaken, A. Segal, D. Cavalier, G. Shani, und K. Gal. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 69-78. ACM, (Juli 2022)
L. Steinert, F. Kölling, F. Putze, D. Küster, und T. Schultz. Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 89-98. ACM, (Juli 2022)Example of a patient focused recsys and evaluation.
M. Millecamp, N. Htun, Y. Jin, und K. Verbert. Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 101-109. ACM, (Juli 2018)
A. Starke, M. Willemsen, und C. Snijders. Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 229-237. ACM, (Juni 2021)
M. Tavakoli, A. Faraji, M. Molavi, S. Mol, und G. Kismihók. (2021)cite arxiv:2112.12100Comment: This paper has been accepted to be published in the 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK'2022), March 21--25, 2022. ACM.
S. Zhang, L. Yao, A. Sun, und Y. Tay. (2017)cite arxiv:1707.07435Comment: The paper has been accepted by ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3285029.
J. O'Donovan, und B. Smyth. IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Seite 167--174. New York, NY, USA, ACM Press, (2005)
N. Tintarev, und J. Masthoff. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop, Seite 801--810. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2007)
K. Balog, F. Radlinski, und S. Arakelyan. Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seite 265-274. ACM, (Juli 2019)
N. Felicioni, M. Dacrema, und P. Cremonesi. Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 10-15. ACM, (Juni 2021)
N. Sonboli, J. Smith, F. Berenfus, R. Burke, und C. Fiesler. Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 274-279. ACM, (Juni 2021)How to explain recommendations that are generated from fairness prospect?.
V. Kaffes, D. Sacharidis, und G. Giannopoulos. Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 280-285. ACM, (Juni 2021)
D. Jannach, M. Jesse, M. Jugovac, und C. Trattner. Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 224-228. ACM, (Juni 2021)
R. Yu, Z. Pardos, H. Chau, und P. Brusilovsky. Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 238-245. ACM, (Juni 2021)
S. Najafian, A. Delic, M. Tkalcic, und N. Tintarev. Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Seite 14-23. ACM, (Juni 2021)
Y. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Li, D. He, und T. Liu. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, Volume 30 von Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Seite 25--54. Princeton, NJ, USA, PMLR, (Juni 2013)
S. Wang, L. Hu, Y. Wang, X. He, Q. Sheng, M. Orgun, L. Cao, F. Ricci, und P. Yu. (2021)cite arxiv:2105.06339Comment: Accepted by IJCAI 2021 Survey Track, copyright is owned to IJCAI. The first systematic survey on graph learning based recommender systems. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2004.11718.
G. Schröder, M. Thiele, und W. Lehner. Proceedings of the Workshop on User-Centric Evaluation of Recommender Systems and Their Interfaces, Seite 78--85. Chicago, USA, CEUR-WS, (Oktober 2011)
M. Dacrema, P. Cremonesi, und D. Jannach. (2019)cite arxiv:1907.06902Comment: Source code available at: https://github.com/MaurizioFD/RecSys2019_DeepLearning_Evaluation.