This paper presents a review of altmetrics or alternative metrics. This concept is defined as the creation and study of new indicators for analysing scientific and academic research activity based onWeb 2.0. The underlying premise is that variables such as mentions in blogs, numberof tweets or saves ofan articleby researchersin reference management systems, may be a valid measure of the use and impactof scientific publications. In this respect,these measuresare becoming particularly relevant, being at the centre of debate within the bibliometric community. Firstly,an explanation is given of the main platforms and indicators for this type of measurement. Subsequently,a study is undertaken of a selection of papers from the field of communication, comparing the number of citations received withtheir 2.0 indicators.The results show that the most cited articles within recent years also have significantly higher altmetric indicators. Next follows a review of the principal empirical studies undertaken, centering on the correlations between bibliometric and alternative indicators. To conclude, the main limitations of altmetrics are highlighted,alongside a reflective consideration of the role altmetrics may play in capturing the impactof research in Web 2.0 platforms.
D. Scott, S. Al-Jibouri, M. Mawdesley, and G. Long. International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2009), March 9-11, 2009, Valencia, Spain, (2009)
M. Feuer, L. Towne, and R. Shavelson. Educational Researcher, 31 (8):
4(2002)“For example, when well-specified causal hypotheses can be formulated and randomization to treatment and control conditions is ethical and feasible, a randomized experiment is the best method for estimating effects” p. 8.
A. Dinner, S. So, and M. Karplus. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR PROTEIN FOLDING, volume 120 of ADVANCES IN CHEMICAL PHYSICS, JOHN WILEY & SONS INC, 605 3RD AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10016 USA, (2002)
T. Hollingsed, and D. Novick. SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, page 249--255. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2007)
M. Andrews, C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou. Sage Publications Ltd., (2008)Examining narrative methods in the context of its multi-disciplinary social science origins, this text looks at its theoretical underpinnings, while retaining an emphasis on the process of doing narrative research. The authors provide a comprehensive guide to narrative methods, taking the reader from initial decisions about forms of narrative analysis, through more complex issues of reflexivity, interpretation and the research context..
D. Clandinin. Sage Publications, Inc., (2006)Composed by international researchers, the Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology is the first comprehensive and interdisciplinary overview of the developing methodology of narrative inquiry. The Handbook outlines the historical development and philosophical underpinnings of narrative inquiry as well as describes different forms of narrative inquiry. This one-of-a-kind volume offers an emerging map of the field and encourages further dialogue, discussion, and experimentation as the field continues to develop..
K. Kinnear, Jr.. Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on
Neural Networks, 2, page 881--888. San Francisco, USA, IEEE Press, (28 March-1 April 1993)