The OLC Quality Scorecard - Benchmarking Tools, Checklists, & Rubrics for Evaluating the Quality and Effectiveness of Online Learning Programs & Courses
The e-Design Assessment Tool (eDAT) is a tool to help tutors represent and evaluate effective blended or distance learning designs. The eDAT combines a simple analysis of the learning activities with reflections on the teaching and learning perspective that underpins the design.
J. Choi, A. Khlif, and E. Epure. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA), page 23--27. Online, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2020)
J. Choi, A. Khlif, and E. Epure. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on NLP for Music and Audio (NLP4MusA), page 23--27. Online, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2020)
M. Ferrari Dacrema, P. Cremonesi, and D. Jannach. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, page 101–109. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (2019)
M. Dacrema, P. Cremonesi, and D. Jannach. (2019)cite arxiv:1907.06902Comment: Source code available at: https://github.com/MaurizioFD/RecSys2019_DeepLearning_Evaluation.
D. Knoell, M. Atzmueller, C. Rieder, and K. Scherer. Proc. GWEM 2017, co-located with 9th Conference Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2017), Karlsruhe, Germany, KIT, (2017)
D. Knoell, M. Atzmueller, C. Rieder, and K. Scherer. Proc. GWEM 2017, co-located with 9th Conference Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2017), Karlsruhe, Germany, KIT, ((In Press) 2017)
D. Knoell, M. Atzmueller, C. Rieder, and K. Scherer. Proc. GWEM 2017, co-located with 9th Conference Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2017), Karlsruhe, Germany, KIT, (2017)
S. Narayanan, M. Kaimal, K. Bijlani, M. Prasanth, and K. Kumar. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Interdisciplinary Advances in Applied Computing, page 51:1--51:5. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2014)
C. Buckley, and E. Voorhees. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2004), page 25--32. Sheffield, United Kingdom, ACM, (July 2004)
P. Brusilovsky, C. Karagiannidis, and D. Sampson. Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems. Proceedings of Workshop at the Eighth International Conference on User Modeling, UM2001, (2001)
J. Brank, D. Madenic, and M. Groblenik. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Evaluating Ontologies for the Web (EON2006), Edinburgh, Scotland, (May 2006)
J. Moskaliuk, J. Kimmerle, and U. Cress. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2008(Bd. 2, S. 99-106). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, page 99-106. (2008)
M. Lux, and G. Dösinger. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning (IJKL), 3 (4/5):
515-528(2007)ISSN (Online): 1741-1017
ISSN (Print): 1741-1009.
J. Houssart, and H. Evens. Proceedings of the sixth British Congress of Mathematics Education held at the University of Warwick, page 65-72. bsrlm, (2005)
H. Evens, and J. Houssart. Educational Research, 46 (3):
269-282(2004)This paper utilizes Toulmin's original framework to analyse over 400 answers given by 11-year-olds to a question on a written mathematics test. The question required children to say whether a given statement is true and give a written explanation. Categorizations of answers are developed from the data and examined, suggesting that many children appeared to understand the mathematics but were not able to give adequate explanations. Findings are also compared with other researchers' findings. In contrast to other studies, a large category of non-valid answers appear mathematical, but are largely restatement of the information the children were given. Although only a minority provided explanations deemed worthy of a mark, further analysis demonstrates greater degrees of comprehension than this suggests. Teaching strategies for building children's expressive and specifying skills are identified..
S. Alexander, and J. Hedberg. Proceedings of the IFIP TC3/WG3.2 Working Conference on the Seign, Implementation and Evaluation of Interactive Multimedia in University Settings, page 233--244. New York, NY, USA, Elsevier Science Inc., (1994)