E. Yackel, and P. Cobb. Nineteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, page 264-271. Recife, Brazil, Program Committee of the 19th PME Conference, (1995)
U. Martin Skrodzki, and K. Polthier. Proceedings of Bridges 2016: Mathematics, Music, Art, Architecture, Education, Culture, page 481--484. Phoenix, Arizona, Tessellations Publishing, (2016)Available online at http://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2016/bridges2016-481.html.
G. Goldin. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph: Qualitative Research Methods in Mathematics Education, (1997)
D. Levin. Proceedings of MEST 2012: Electronic structure methods with applications to experimental chemistry, volume 68 of Advances in Quantum Chemistry, chapter 2, Academic Press, (2014)
C. Sackur, T. Assude, and M. Maurel. European Research in Mathematics Education I.I + I.II Proceedings of the First Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 1 & 2, Osnabrueck, Forschungsinstitut fuer Mathematikdidaktik, (1999)
R. Movassagh. (2019)cite arxiv:1909.06210Comment: 18 pages + Acknowledgements and references. 3 Figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1810.04681.
H. Evens, and J. Houssart. Educational Research, 46 (3):
269-282(2004)This paper utilizes Toulmin's original framework to analyse over 400 answers given by 11-year-olds to a question on a written mathematics test. The question required children to say whether a given statement is true and give a written explanation. Categorizations of answers are developed from the data and examined, suggesting that many children appeared to understand the mathematics but were not able to give adequate explanations. Findings are also compared with other researchers' findings. In contrast to other studies, a large category of non-valid answers appear mathematical, but are largely restatement of the information the children were given. Although only a minority provided explanations deemed worthy of a mark, further analysis demonstrates greater degrees of comprehension than this suggests. Teaching strategies for building children's expressive and specifying skills are identified..
D. Carraher, A. Schliemann, and B. Brizuela. Proceedings of the XXV Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (2001)
K. Sedighian, and A. Sedighian. 18th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education -- the North American Chapter, Florida, USA, (1996)
K. Sedighian, and A. Sedighian. 18th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education -- the North American Chapter, Florida, USA, (1996)
A. Gorban, and I. Tyukin. (2018)cite arxiv:1801.03421Comment: Accepted for publication in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2018. Comprises of 17 pages and 4 figures.
M. Bhargava, and A. Shankar. (2010)cite arxiv:1006.1002Comment: Proofs have been considerably streamlined, and a number of clarifying details have been added; 36 pages.
P. Eynde, E. Corte, and L. Verschaffel. Conference on Mathematics Beliefs and Their Impact on Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Mathematical Research Institute, Oberwolfach, Germany, (1999)
D. Ingalls, T. Kaehler, J. Maloney, S. Wallace, and A. Kay. OOPSLA '97: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications, page 318-326. New York, NY, ACM Press, (1997)