C. Buckley, and E. Voorhees. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2004), page 25--32. Sheffield, United Kingdom, ACM, (July 2004)
J. Najjar, S. Ternier, and E. Duval. Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2004 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, (June 2004)
G. Sakko, T. Martin, T. Vause, G. Martin, and C. Yu. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109 (1):
44-52(January 2004)MT: Print; FO: Print; PO: Human; Male; Female; AG: Adulthood (18-yrs-and-older); Young-Adulthood (18-29-yrs); Thirties (30-39-yrs); Middle-Age (40-64-yrs); LO: Canada; MD: Empirical-Study; Quantitative-Study; CRN: Number of References: 17; Displayed: 17.; REF: Barker-Collo, S., Jamieson, J., & Boo, F. (1995). Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test: Prediction of communication ability in persons with developmental disabilities. International journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19, 23-28. Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (1999). Hierarchical ordering of auditory discriminations and the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 6, 32-50. Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J. A. (1977). The measurement of motor, visual, and auditory discrimination skills Monograph. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 95-112. Martin, G. L., & Pear, J. J. (2003). Behavior modification: What is it and how to do it (7th ed.). Upper Saddle Rivers, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (2000). Overview of research on the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 7, 10-36. Martin, G. L., Yu, D., Quinn, G., & Patterson, S. (1983). Measurement and training of AVC discrimination skills: Independent confirmation and extension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 231-237. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.4.231 Meyerson, L. (1977). AVC behavior and attempts to modify it Monograph. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 119-122. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1995). The ABLA test for predicting performance of develop-mentally disabled persons on prevocational training tasks. International Journal of Practical Approaches to Disability, 19, 12-17. Stubbings, V., & Martin, G. L. (1998). Matching training tasks to abilities of people with mental retardation: A learning test versus experienced staff. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102, 473-484. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)1022.0.CO;2 Tharinger, D., Schauert, D., & Kerr, N. (1977). Use of AVC tasks to predict classroom learning in mentally retarded children. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 113-118. Vause, T., Martin, G. L., & Yu, D. (1999). Aberrant behavior of persons with developmental disabilities as a function of the characteristics of training tasks. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 321-325. Vause, T., Martin, G. L., Cornick, A., Harapiak, S., Chong, L., Yu, D. C. T., & Garinger, J. (2000). Training task assignments and aberrant behavior of persons with developmental disabilities. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7, 37-53. Wacker, D. P. (1981). Applicability of discrimination assessment procedure with hearing impaired mentally handicapped clients. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 51-58. Wacker, D. P., Kerr, N. J., & Carroll, J. L. (1983). Discrimination skill as a predictor of prevocational performance of institutionalized mentally retarded clients. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 45-49. doi:10.1037//0090-5550.28.1.45 Wacker, D. P., Steil, D. A., & Greenebaum, F. T. (1983). Assessment of discrimination skills of multiply-handicapped preschoolers and prediction of classroom task performance. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 65-78. Witt, J. C., & Wacker, D. P. (1981). Teaching children to respond to auditory directives: An evaluation of two procedures. Behavior Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities, 2, 175-189. Yu, D., & Martin, G. L. (1986). Comparison of two procedures to teach visual discriminations to severely mentally handicapped persons. Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicap, 10, 7-12..
P. Dolog, N. Henze, W. Nejdl, and M. Sintek. Proceedings of the 13th international World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters, page 170--179. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2004)
V. Kaptelinin, K. Danielsson, and U. Hedestig. Paper presented at the First Kaleidoscope SIG CSCL Conference (Lausanne, Switzerland, October 2004), (2004)
P. Cimiano, A. Hotho, and S. Staab. Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'04), page 435-439. Valencia, Spain, IOS Press, (2004)
W. Schenck, and R. Möller. chapter Staged Learning of Saccadic Eye Movements with a Robot Camera Head, page 82-91. World Scientific, New Jersey, London, (2004)
Y. LeCun, F. Huang, and L. Bottou. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings
of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 2, page II-97--104 Vol.2. (2004)
O. Park, and J. Lee. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, chapter 25, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J., 2nd edition edition, (2004)
J. Maloney, L. Burd, Y. Kafai, N. Rusk, B. Silverman, and M. Resnick. C5 '04: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, page 104-109. Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2004)
H. Evens, and J. Houssart. Educational Research, 46 (3):
269-282(2004)This paper utilizes Toulmin's original framework to analyse over 400 answers given by 11-year-olds to a question on a written mathematics test. The question required children to say whether a given statement is true and give a written explanation. Categorizations of answers are developed from the data and examined, suggesting that many children appeared to understand the mathematics but were not able to give adequate explanations. Findings are also compared with other researchers' findings. In contrast to other studies, a large category of non-valid answers appear mathematical, but are largely restatement of the information the children were given. Although only a minority provided explanations deemed worthy of a mark, further analysis demonstrates greater degrees of comprehension than this suggests. Teaching strategies for building children's expressive and specifying skills are identified..