The increasing presence of technology mediation offers an unprecedented opportunity to use detailed data sets about the interactions that occur while a learning experience is being enacted
Gibson, A., Aitken, A., Sándor, Á., Buckingham Shum, S., Tsingos-Lucas, C. and Knight, S. (2017). Reflective Writing Analytics for Actionable Feedback.
The OnTask Project aims to improve the academic experience of students through the delivery of timely, personalised and actionable student feedback throughout their participation in a course
I chose this video because it highlights how technology can be used to differentiate instruction and of course assessment. I think this is one of the biggest areas where technology can be a game changer in terms of presenting material in different manners and allowing students to show their knowledge and application in different ways. The comments about day to day feedback and self assessment was a theme I found in several of the clips and articles.
This video looks at improving assessments so they don’t just measure learning but help create learning. It had some great examples of where folks go wrong and focuses on higher education where I preside. I enjoyed how it outlined better steps to lead to learning. Thinking about incorporating peer feedback as well as the need for good rubrics played in well to the greater themes.
H. Gabbay, and A. Cohen. Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, page 177–187. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 15, 2024)
H. Heickal, and A. Lan. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, page 947--951. Atlanta, Georgia, USA, International Educational Data Mining Society, (July 2024)
P. Denny, S. MacNeil, J. Savelka, L. Porter, and A. Luxton-Reilly. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, page 408–414. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 3, 2024)
P. Bassner, E. Frankford, and S. Krusche. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, page 394–400. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 3, 2024)
C. Koutcheme, N. Dainese, S. Sarsa, A. Hellas, J. Leinonen, and P. Denny. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, page 52–58. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 3, 2024)
M. Pankiewicz, and R. Baker. Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, page 94–100. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (Jul 3, 2024)
P. Cantillon, and J. Sargeant. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), (January 2008)4957<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 8900488; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Formació.
W. Chang, and I. McLean. BMC medical research methodology, (January 2006)4243<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>PUBM: Electronic; DEP: 20060302; JID: 100968545; 2005/09/07 received; 2006/03/02 accepted; 2006/03/02 aheadofprint; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Mesures de contrast.
A. Halkoaho, M. Matveinen, V. Leinonen, K. Luoto, and T. Keränen. BMC medical ethics, 14 (1):
53(January 2013)<b>From Duplicate 2 (<i>Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool.</i> - Halkoaho, Arja; Matveinen, Mari; Leinonen, Ville; Luoto, Kirsi; Keränen, Tapani)<br/></b><br/>Ètica; Formació; Recerca clínica.
S. Ambrose, M. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. Lovett, and M. Norman. John Wiley & Sons, (2010)Learning results from what the student does and thinks and only from what the student does and thinks. The teacher can advance learning only by influencing what the student does to learn. Herbert Simon.
V. Rivera-Pelayo, J. Munk, V. Zacharias, and S. Braun. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, page 23–27. New York, NY, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, (2013)
X. He, L. Liao, H. Zhang, L. Nie, X. Hu, and T. Chua. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, page 173–182. Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, (2017)
S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, page 452--461. Arlington, Virginia, United States, AUAI Press, (2009)
D. Weikle, M. Lam, and M. Kirkpatrick. Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, page 565--570. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2019)