L. Lee. Approaches to algebra: perspectives for research and teaching, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p 102
… it is much of a challenge to demonstrate that functions, modelling, and problem solving are all types of generalizing activities, that algebra and indeed all of mathematics is about generalizing patterns.
p 103
The history of the science of algebra is the story of the growth of a technique for representing of finite patterns.
The notion of the importance of pattern is as old as civilization. Every art is founded on the study of patterns.
Mathematics is the most powerful technique for the understanding of pattern, and for the analysis of the relationships of patterns.(1996)
J. Carroll, G. Chin, M. Rosson, und D. Neale. Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, (2000)
V. Barre, C. Chaquet, und H. El-Kechaï. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Workshop on Usage Analysis in Learning Systems, Amsterdam, (2005)
P. Ernest. Why Learn Maths, London University Institute of Education, London, 1. To reproduce mathematical skill and knowledge based capability
The typical traditional reproductive mathematics curriculum has focused exclusively on this first aim, comprising a narrow reading of mathematical capability. At the highest level, not always realised, the learner learns to answer questions posed by the teacher or text. As is argued elsewhere (Ernest 1991) this serves not only to reproduce mathematical knowledge and skills in the learner, but to reproduce the social order and social injustice as well.
2. To develop creative capabilities in mathematics
The progressive mathematics teaching movement has added a second aim, to allow the learner to be creative and express herself in mathematics, via problem solving, investigational work, using a variety of representations, and so on. This allows the learner to pose mathematical questions, puzzles and problems, as well as to solve them. This notion adds the idea of creative personal development and the skills of mathematical questioning as a goal of schooling, but remains trapped in an individualistic ideology that fails to acknowledge the social and societal contexts of schooling, and thus tacitly endorses the social status quo.
3. To develop empowering mathematical capabilities and a critical appreciation of the social applications and uses of mathematics
Critical mathematics education adds in a third aim, the empowerment of the learner through the development of critical mathematical literacy capabilities and the critical appreciation of the mathematics embedded in social and political contexts. Thus the empowered learner will not only be able to pose and solve mathematical questions, but also be able to address important questions relating to the broad range of social uses (and abuses) of mathematics. This is a radical perspective and set of aims concerned with both the political and social empowerment of the learner and with the promotion of social justice, and which is realised in mainstream school education almost nowhere. However, the focus in the appreciation element developed in this perspective is on the external social contexts of mathematics. Admittedly these may include the history of mathematics and its past and present cultural contexts, but these do not represent any full treatment of mathematical appreciation.
4. To develop an inner appreciation of mathematics: its big ideas and nature
This fourth aim adds in further dimension of mathematical appreciation, namely the inner appreciation of mathematics, including the big ideas and nature of mathematics. The appreciation of mathematics as making a unique contribution to human culture with special concepts and a powerful aesthetic of its own, is an aim for school mathematics often neglected by mathematicians and users of mathematics alike. It is common for persons like these to emphasise capability at the expense of appreciation, and external applications at the expense of its inner nature and values. One mistake that may be made in this connection is the assumption that an inner appreciation of mathematics cannot be developed without capability. Thus, according to this assumption, the student cannot appreciate infinity, proof, catastrophe theory and chaos, for example, unless they have developed capability in these high level mathematical topics, which is out of the question at school. The fourth aim questions this assumption and suggests that an inner appreciation of mathematics is not only possible but desirable to some degree for all students at school..(2000)
P. Kolari, T. Finin, und A. Joshi. AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, (März 2006)Also available as technical report TR-CS-05-13.
P. Cimiano, J. Völker, und R. Studer. Information, Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57 (6-7):
315-320(Oktober 2006)see the special issue for more contributions related to the Semantic Web.
M. Akbarzadeh-T., E. Tunstel, K. Kumbla, und M. Jamshidi. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE World Congress on
Computational Intelligence, 2, Seite 1200--1205. Anchorage, Alaska, USA, IEEE Press, (5-9 May 1998)
R. Aler, D. Borrajo, und P. Isasi. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary
Computation CEC2001, Seite 1220--1227. COEX, World Trade Center, 159 Samseong-dong,
Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea, IEEE Press, (27-30 May 2001)
K. Kinnear, Jr.. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE World Conference on
Computational Intelligence, 1, Seite 142--147. Orlando, Florida, USA, IEEE Press, (27-29 June 1994)
I. Jonyer, und A. Himes. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida
Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Seite 556--561. Melbourne Beach, Florida, USA, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, (Mai 2006)
H. Allert, H. Markannen, und C. Richter. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Learner-Oriented Knowledge Management and KM-Oriented Learning (LOKMOL 06), in conjunction with the First European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (ECTEL 06), Seite 115-125. (02.10.2006)
T. Grenager, und C. Manning. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, (2006)
C. Sutton, M. Sindelar, und A. McCallum. Proceedings of the main conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Seite 89--95. Morristown, NJ, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2006)
S. Alexander, und J. Hedberg. Proceedings of the IFIP TC3/WG3.2 Working Conference on the Seign, Implementation and Evaluation of Interactive Multimedia in University Settings, Seite 233--244. New York, NY, USA, Elsevier Science Inc., (1994)
D. Séaghdha. Proceedings of the ACL 2007 Student Research Workshop, Seite 73--78. Prague, Czech Republic, Association for Computational Linguistics, (Juni 2007)
M. Chang, L. Ratinov, und D. Roth. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Seite 280--287. Prague, Czech Republic, Association for Computational Linguistics, (Juni 2007)
R. Kohavi. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seite 1137-1145. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, (1995)
L. Schmidt-Thieme. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2005), 27-30 November 2005, Seite 378-385. Houston, Texas, USA, IEEE Computer Society, (2005)
G. Gibbs, A. Morgan, und L. Taylor. Study Methods Group Report No. 5, Institute of Educational Technology, Open University, Milton Keynes, England, (1980)
J. Neville, M. Rattigan, und D. Jensen. Proceedings of the Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, Eighteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2003)